Share
 
Title
Presenter
Authors
Institutions

Background: Risk perception is central to behaviour change theories that informed HIV prevention interventions, but mixed evidence exists on associations between risk perception and sexual behaviour. This may be because risk perception is essentially a bi-directional longitudinal concept which is difficult to capture in cross-sectional studies. We use longitudinal data to examine whether changes in sexual behaviour lead to changes in risk perception, and whether changes in risk perception lead to changes in protective behaviour.
Methods: Data on HIV-negative adults (15-54 years) participating in ≥2 of 4 surveys (2003-2013) in a general-population open-cohort study in Zimbabwe were analysed. Individuals not reporting risk perception in the first of two surveys were examined regarding whether changes in sexual risk (having multiple, casual, or concurrent sexual partnerships) between surveys were associated with risk perception at follow-up. Individuals not reporting condom use during last sex in the first survey were examined regarding whether developing risk perception between surveys was associated with condom use at follow-up. Data were analysed as panel and logistic regressions were adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics.
Results: Among respondents not reporting HIV risk perception in the first of two surveys (n=5259/N=10089), increasing sexual risk between surveys was associated with developing risk perception (odds ratio [OR]=1.56, 95% confidence interval=1.09-2.24) (Table). Despite this higher relative risk among those increasing sexual risk, 86.0% of all developing risk perception (993/1155) did not change their sexual risk. Among respondents not using condoms in the first survey (n=7234), developing risk perception was associated with starting condom use (OR=1.52 [1.19-1.94]), controlling for changes in sexual risk, marital status, and other socio-demographic factors (Table). 63.5% of all starting to use condoms (374/590) did not change their risk perception.
Conclusions: This is the first longitudinal study confirming expected associations between changes in sexual behaviour and HIV risk perception, and between changes in risk perception and protective behaviour. The results support prevention programmes to educate about risky behaviour and increase risk perception. However, only a small proportion of changes in condom use could be attributed to changes in risk perception, underlining the importance of other factors that determine HIV prevention behaviour, including factors beyond individual control.


Changes in sexual risk between surveys and risk perception at follow-up among those not perceiving a risk in the first survey.Changes in HIV risk perception between surveys and condom use during last sex at follow-up among those not reporting condom use in the first survey.
Outcome: Risk perceptionAll (N=5180)Males (N=2359)Females (N=2821)Outcome: Condom useAll (N=7059)Males (N=2112)Females (N=4947)
 aOR (95% CI)aOR (95% CI)aOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI)aOR (95% CI)aOR (95% CI)
Sexual risk: No change1 (Reference)1 (Reference)1 (Reference)Risk perception: No change1 (Reference)1 (Reference)1 (Reference)
Sexual risk: Increased risk1.56 (1.09-2.24)1.59 (1.03-2.44)1.34 (0.73-2.44)Risk perception: Increase1.52 (1.19-1.94)1.89 (1.12-3.19)1.41 (1.01-1.98)
Sexual risk: Decreased risk0.67 (0.46-0.99)0.71 (0.45-1.13)0.67 (0.37-1.20)Risk perception: Decrease1.24 (0.98-1.56)1.51 (0.92-2.47)1.16 (0.88-1.50)
Values are adjusted odds ratios (aOR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and sample sizes (N). The sexual risk variable was based on reported multiple partners in the past 12 months, having at least one casual partners in the past 3 years, or having more than one sexual relationship at the time of the survey. A change in sexual risk was from having none of these risk factors to any of these (increase) or from any of these to none (decrease). Data were restricted to those not reporting risk perception in the first survey. The outcome was HIV risk perception at follow-up. Further covariates: Age, sex, change in marital status, change in condom use, survey round, and study site.Values are adjusted odds ratios (aOR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and sample sizes (N). A change in risk perception was defined as reporting risk perception at follow-up but not baseline (increase) or reporting risk perception at baseline but not at follow-up (decrease). Data were restricted to those not using a condom during last sex in the first survey. The outcome was condom use during last sex at follow-up. Further covariates: Age, sex, change in marital status, change in sexual risk, survey round, and study site.
[Changes in sexual risk and risk perception, and changes in risk perception and condom use]

Download the e-Poster